SWANApalooza Ski Day in Tahoe

Recyclist and SWANA are excited to offer SWANApalooza conference attendees the opportunity to spend a day skiing in the iconic Lake Tahoe area. Sign up below to join us for a day at Northstar California, which offers stunning views of the lake, ski terrain from beginner to advanced, and a variety of activities and amenities.

Eager to show off our beautiful backyard, the Tahoe-based Recyclist team will be your tour guides for the day, sharing local history and stories, and showing you the best trails on the mountain.

The event will be capped at 25 people. Spots will be filled on a first-come, first-served basis. Skiers and snowboarders alike are welcome.

Date & Schedule

Thursday, March 30, 2017

The group will depart Reno by bus in the morning (approx. 7:30am), get outfitted with equipment, then break into groups for skiing and exploration. We will all convene for an on-mountain lunch midday. In the afternoon, there’s time for more skiing, or enjoying Northstar’s village and shops. We’ll be back at the hotel between 4 and 5pm.

Cost

There are two registration levels:

  • Lift ticket and transportation with equipment rental – $180
  • Lift ticket and transportation without equipment rental – $130  **Please note: if you select this registration, you should plan on bringing your own equipment.

Lunch and incidentals will be paid individually.

Questions

If you have questions, or are eager to experience the mountains but less sure about skiing, please contact Recyclist’s Project Manager (and former professional cross-country ski racer) Emily Blackmer at eblackmer@recyclist.co.

Registration

Registration for the ski day is open! If you haven’t yet registered for SWANApalooza, you can register for the conference and the ski day at the same time. Or, if you have already registered for SWANApalooza, you can add the ski day by clicking “View or Change Your Existing Registration” on the log-in page. Register now.

 

Let the Yellow Pages Be Bygone

For a long time, the yellow pages were the final word on local businesses and services, including recycling information. Need to find a copy shop, a pizza or how to recycle old tires? It was all in the yellow pages. But in the past decade or so, the internet has become a major player in nearly every aspect of daily life. Meanwhile, the phone books dropped on our doorsteps have grown thinner and thinner. Old habits die hard, though, both for businesses that buy ads and for the public who use phone book directories. So in the era of the internet, what’s the role of the yellow pages?

As it turns out, the marketing punditry enjoys this topic. We searched the internet high and low, and everyone — from Forbes.com to marketing professionals to a Reddit thread — agrees that print yellow pages have ceded their dominance to online search (including internet yellow pages). Marketing analysts take data seriously; here’s a slice of what they had to say:

  • In 2011, a Forbes.com columnist reported that up to 80 percent of the time, consumers use an internet search first when looking for a new product or service. And that was five years ago.

However, this doesn’t mean that the yellow pages are totally, completely, shot-to-the-heart dead. For certain demographics, primarily the rural elderly, a good old-fashioned phone book might still work. But unless your business specifically caters to that population — offering a personal transportation service, for example — you’re unlikely to get much bang for your buck.

To get the full story, we decided to let the publishers speak for themselves. When we contacted the Yellow Pages company to ask about listing a mini recycling guide in the directory for a mid-sized California county, the sales rep quoted almost $2,000 per annum for a quarter-page ad. And then to our surprise, he said that even though his job was to sell yellow pages ads, he wanted to be transparent with us: He didn’t think the ad would be worth it.

If and when people still use the yellow pages, they are often seeking a very specific service. If you’re a plumber who offers on-call help in emergency situations, then you might well receive calls from people who found you in the yellow pages. But people tend not to browse the yellow pages anymore, the sales rep said. Instead, they use the internet: searches for local services, products, news and information are all increasingly taking place online.

The bottom line? The print yellow pages are no longer the right place to advertise recycling information. If you’re determined to have some sort of listing, go no further than a name and a URL (i.e., My Town’s Municipal Waste & Recycling Department, mytownrecycles.com). The internet yellow pages may or may not be worth it for local business advertising, but they don’t make sense for local recycling information. Your best bet is a great website, a strong search engine optimization (SEO) strategy and targeted, effective outreach that finds your residents where they already are — online.

Recyclist’s Latest Feature: Embeddable Sites

“But how will people who come to our city website know about our Recyclist site?” This is a question that’s come up many times, and up until now, our answer was that we can link from the city website to the Recyclist site. But that never sat that well with us as a fantastic solution, and we are in the business of creating only fantastic solutions. We knew there was something better, and today we’re happy to announce that something better is here.

Now all Recyclist customers on our Public Education & Outreach Platform can embed mini versions of their sites anywhere they want, with a few simple lines of code. We anticipate this will be used primarily on city websites, but we also see this new feature as an opportunity for our customers to offer the code to other organizations who support their outreach efforts — e.g., haulers, Keep America Beautiful affiliates, conservation corps, and other government departments whose work relates to solid waste. By sharing the code with other organizations, we see a big potential for cities to leverage or establish new public-public and public-private partnerships, extending the reach of their message well beyond traditional channels.

Check out the embedded version of Stockton Recycles here:


At Recyclist we are constantly developing new features for our platforms. That is the promise of the Software as a Service model: when you sign up to use our platform, not only is your software always up to date and supported, it’s also always getting better and better. Stay tuned for more new features, and as always, please get in touch with us if you have an idea — no matter how crazy! — about how Recyclist’s platforms could work better for you.

The Best Outreach Tool You’re Not Using (But 65% of Neighborhoods Are)

Nextdoor is a private social network site for neighborhoods. Launched in 2010, it’s intended to help neighbors share local information, whether that’s to vet a car mechanic, find a lost dog or safeguard against threats. As of September 2016, Nextdoor had 110,000 registered neighborhoods in the United States. That’s 65 percent of all neighborhoods in the country.

In 2014, Nextdoor expanded its platform to allow municipal agencies to join the conversation. As a municipal user, you can post information to either a single neighborhood or all the neighborhoods in your city. To protect residents’ privacy, public agencies can’t see private conversations between residents — just information that has been communicated directly to the agency, or responses to agency posts.

So far, Nextdoor has been used primarily by safety and health officials for community engagement, crime prevention and alert, disaster preparedness and community policing. But other types of city or county administrators have also found the platform useful. San Mateo County uses Nextdoor to communicate with residents about a variety of issues, including recycling and waste.

Kathryn Cooke, a pollution prevention specialist in San Mateo County’s Environmental Health Services Division, described Nextdoor as a great way to connect with residents. It’s free, as she pointed out, and a growing number of residents and neighborhoods are using the platform. After giving Nextdoor a hearty recommendation, Kathryn kindly shared the following tips with us:

  • Nextdoor users are looking for information about how their government is serving them. Posts should not sound promotional.
  • Residents don’t want Nextdoor to be inundated with repetitive information coming from several directions. It helps to have one point person who manages and posts information coming from multiple departments. (Nextdoor itself allows one account per city/county, used by multiple departments or agencies.)
  • Information should be current and relevant, or responding to issues and concerns.
  • Nextdoor seems to be most popular among families; it’s not quite as useful to reach younger age groups.

San Mateo County has used Nextdoor to spread the word about upcoming household hazardous collection events, to conduct seasonal outreach (e.g., what to do with yard litter, where to dispose of castoffs from a spring cleaning purge) and to address community concerns (e.g., how the county is responding to illegal dumping or scavenging). If you think Nextdoor might help your community outreach efforts, learn more here:

Deep Dive Into the Latest Recycling Survey: The Upshots You Haven’t Heard Yet

The recent Carton Council survey has given us the latest numbers on recycling attitudes and awareness, and the industry is buzzing.

The media is focusing on two major takeaways from the survey. Number one: The general public believes recycling is important. Nearly two-thirds of survey participants reported that recycling should be a priority, and almost one-third said it was somewhat important. On top of that, a whopping 95 percent of participants said they believe recycling has some degree of positive impact on the environment. That’s great news, because it means that most people already have the motivation necessary to recycle. They just need to know how.

Which brings us to the second point the media is highlighting: Citizens don’t only want to be informed, they also want to be reminded. The survey shows that recycling is already a habit for many people — but how can we grow many into most or all? Recycling behavior can be reinforced and improved, and citizens are looking for help. This is why the Recyclist platform offers weekly pick-up day reminders that are paired with recycling tips, capitalizing on 52 opportunities per year to educate our clients’ residents and businesses.

So the survey tells us that recycling is popular, and more education is needed to ensure follow-through. We agree, but after taking a closer look at the reports, we’ve honed in on three upshots that shouldn’t be missed.

1. Your outreach goes further than you think.

If you can educate one person, they will educate others. More than a third of respondents reported that they get community information they trust from friends, and 18 percent reported that they receive recycling-specific information from their friends. So if you’re worried that your outreach has a limited target audience, remember that your message carries a life of its own.

2. Increasing numbers of people are relying on city websites for recycling information.

Plenty of people still rely on packaging for recycling information. That’s bad news, because even when a package is clear about being recyclable, that doesn’t mean it’s going to be recyclable in any given community. The good news is that this is changing. Just between 2013 and 2015, there has been a 25 percent decrease in reliance on packaging for recycling information, and a 15 percent decrease in reliance on product websites. In contrast, there has been a 30 percent increase in reliance on local government sites. Residents are becoming more skeptical of company product information and turning to their local governments to get information they can trust.

3. Effective outreach uses multiple channels.

Citizens rely on different channels to get trustworthy information about their communities. 43 percent of people get trustworthy community information from the news, 29 percent from local municipalities, and 21 percent from email and social media. These are three major pathways for communication. If you’re not taking advantage of all of them, you’re missing key opportunities. When we plan outreach, we often think that one major avenue is going to be enough, but the truth is that people go through different channels to find information. This is part of our strategy at Recyclist, where we provide local information through municipal websites, email and social media, as well as press releases our clients can distribute to news agencies. These numbers remind us that the more channels you utilize, the more people you are likely to reach.

The Carton Council survey, conducted by Research+Data Insights, was based on a 15-minute online questionnaire of close to 2,500 Americans who reported having access to curbside recycling programs in their communities. To access the original PDF reports, visit the Carton Council website.

Up Your Writing Game with These 4 Easy Tools

Everyone knows that you should have someone check your work before you publish it, whether it’s in print, online or just an important email. But it’s hard to find a good editor, and even harder to corner someone when everyone is always so busy. The Federal Plain Language Guidelines recommend conducting interviews and surveys to test your writing, though for most of us that’s even more unrealistic than finding an editor. Here is where these neat (and free!) tools come in: You can make your writing better without leaving your desk and without having to trouble any of your coworkers for a favor.

Say we want to do some outreach around packaging consumption, so we write this paragraph:

When consuming any type of product, it’s important to consider the packaging. In 2009, nearly 30 percent of municipal solid waste consisted of containers and packaging, and less than half of that waste was recovered for recycling. So, its important to purchase products with zero packaging at all (i.e. bulk items), purchase products with packaging you can reuse, or purchase products with packaging that you can recycle in your area.

It’s all right, but it could use some improvement. Let’s run it through these four writing tests, and see if they can help us make it stronger.

 

Readability-Score

readability-score-before-1
 

Readability-Score says the reading ease of this paragraph is 56.7. That’s not terrible, but when writing for the web or general public, you want to be at 60 or higher, so we could use some improvement. Readability-Score also says we’re at an average grade level of 11.8, and we’re aiming for 8. Here’s the other data Readability-Score gives us:

 
readability-score-before-2
 

It’s a lot to take in, but let’s focus on the following: our average number of words per sentence is close to 14, and we’re repeating a few words too much. With that in mind, let’s revise the paragraph for shorter sentences and fewer repeated words. Here’s the revised version:

 

When consuming any type of product, it’s important to consider the packaging. In 2009, nearly 30 percent of municipal solid waste consisted of containers and packaging. Less than half of that waste was recovered for recycling. So try to purchase products with zero packaging at all (i.e. bulk items), types you can reuse, or types that you can recycle in your area.

 

What does Readability-Score think?

 
readability-score-after-1
 

Our new Reading Ease Score is 67.5. That’s a ten-point improvement. And our new grade level is about 9.4. (Though Flesch-Kincaid, this site’s favorite formula, and the most commonly used, rates it at 6.4.) What about the other ratings?

 
readability-score-after-2
 
Our word repetition has dropped, though the highest is still our topic, “packaging,” and our sentences are four words shorter on average.
 
Overall? Success. This tool’s amount of feedback can be a little overwhelming at first, but once you get the hang of it, it’s pretty useful.
 

Hemingway

hemingway-before
 

Hemingway says our last two sentences are too hard to read, and the word “purchase” can be replaced with “buy” or “sale.” It also recommends we remove our one adverb, “nearly,” though our one use of passive voice is tolerable. Hemingway’s grade level calculation sticks us at 14 — that’s pretty bad. But let’s see what happens when we revise for these concerns. Our new paragraph:

 

When consuming any type of product, it’s important to consider the packaging. In 2009, almost 30 percent of municipal solid waste consisted of containers and packaging. Less than half of that waste was recovered for recycling. Try to buy products with zero packaging at all (i.e. bulk items). If that isn’t an option, then choose items with packaging that you can reuse or recycle in your area.

 

What does Hemingway have to say?

 
hemingway-after
According to Hemingway, this paragraph is problem-free. Also, in simplifying the language and shortening those hard-to-read sentences, we’ve dropped the grade level to 7. Nice.
 

Writer’s Diet

writersdiet-before
 
The Writer’s Diet isn’t the perfect test for such a short writing sample, but it says our paragraph “needs toning” — not a super flattering diagnosis. When you look at all of those prepositions highlighted in green, though, it does seem like a lot. We could probably use a couple less adjectives, too. Let’s see what we can do to reduce our usage of those types of words.
 

When consuming any type of product, it’s important to consider the packaging. In 2009, almost 30 percent of municipal solid waste consisted of containers and packaging, and less than half of that waste was recovered for recycling. Aim to purchase products with zero packaging, such as bulk items, packaging you can reuse, or packaging you can recycle in your area.

 
What does the test say?
 
writersdiet-after
 
This new paragraph still contains a lot of prepositions, but less problematic phrasing overall, earning a new diagnosis of “fit and trim.”
 

Grammarly

grammarly-before
Grammarly is the first test to point out our “its/it’s” typo. But it doesn’t have a lot to say besides — if you want feedback on any advanced issues, you have to purchase their full product.
 

The Takeaway

Each of these writing tools has different strengths, so your favorite is going to depend on your needs and preferences for delivery. Grammarly is great for catching typos and giving word suggestions, and can also be used in conjunction with these other writing tools, though it frequently suggests that you pay for their full service. The Writer’s Diet is great to point out patterns in your writing style, if you tend to overuse certain types of phrasing. Hemingway gives color-coded feedback on specific sentences, though Readability-Score will tell you if you’re having problems because you need shorter sentences or shorter words. Keep in mind, too, that all these tools offer extra services for menial fees.

No matter which you prefer, with these tools at your fingertips, you’ll be out of excuses for bad, unclear writing. Now get to it — the world is in need of a little extra clarity.

Talking Organics at the SWANA Western Regional Symposium

If you’re attending the SWANA Western Regional Symposium, come by the Organics Solutions Technical Session to hear Beyond Spreadsheets: Using Cloud Technology for Commercial Organics Monitoring, Compliance and Outreach by Recyclist Founder Emily Coven.

Attendees will get a closer look at our cloud-based solution that makes it (literally!) 7 million times faster to identify businesses that are on the hook for AB 1826 compliance in 2016, 2017 and 2019, and then to track their progress and conduct simple, effective outreach.

We look forward to a great conversation with SWANA members about the challenges and opportunities in a data-based approach to managing commercial organics programs, including accessing and working with hauler data, balancing automated vs in-person outreach, and venturing into self-reporting and text messaging.

4 Reasons Why Email Marketing Still Works for Local Governments

Feeling pressured to start Twitter and Facebook accounts for your environmental program, or to put in constant effort to keep them updated? Know this: Even in the age of social media, email marketing – regular e-newsletters or an occasional email promoting a new program or initiative – is still an effective tool to reach community members. Here are four reasons why:

1. Email is versatile

Emails work across a variety of platforms. A Gmail user can forward a message to Yahoo Mail and vice-versa. On the other hand, it’s more common for social media content to remain siloed in the channel in which it originated.

Regular social media users are also more likely to frequently check their email than individuals who abstain from social media, marketing agency Merkle found. In its 2010 study, 42 percent of regular social media users checked their personal email accounts four times a day or more, compared to only 26 percent of non-social media users who did the same. So even if you’re not reaching the exact same audiences across the board, it’s likely that your email campaign will successfully reach many social media users.

2. Email is mobile-friendly

According to the Pew Research Center, 52 percent of cell phone owners used their phones to send or receive email in 2013, and that number is likely to grow. Email marketing works on other mobile devices, too, such as tablets, which only increases your campaign’s reach.

3. Email is inexpensive

If you’re trying to reach community members on their smartphones, email is a much cheaper marketing tool than text messages. Emails are free for your constituents to receive, while texts may be hit with a fee. Emails can also accommodate more content than text messages, giving you more bang for your outreach buck. Even if you pay for an email marketing service like Constant Contact or MailChimp to send your emails, you’ll still be sending emails to a large group of constituents at a rate of pennies per message, whereas sending texts to that same group can be prohibitively expensive. Email marketing is also less costly than purchasing online or print ads.

4. Email is effective

The statistics don’t lie: For every dollar a small business spends on email marketing, its average return on investment is $44.25, the Direct Marketing Association found. Email marketing is also nearly 40 times more effective at helping small businesses acquire customers than Facebook and Twitter, according to McKinsey and Company. And Gigaom Research notes in this PDF report that marketers consistently ranked email as the single-most effective tactic for businesses to build awareness and attract, convert and retain customers.

Sure, those are impressive figures for small businesses, but how does this translate to government agencies? Of the 75 percent of Americans who are online, an impressive 82 percent of them say they interact with government online, according to a report from the Pew Research Center. Yes, the mission of local governments is very different from that of a small business that is looking to woo and maintain a loyal customer base. But, at the end of the day, your goal is to communicate your message effectively, encourage participation and elicit engagement from your community. So even if you’re publicizing an e-waste collection event or promoting a new food waste program, these goals mirror the aims of a business looking to promote a service or product.

That’s why email marketing isn’t just a valuable outreach tool for businesses – it’s effective for cities and counties, too.

On Writing Environmental Content for Governments

Recently, a potential customer asked us to provide an explicit editorial policy — our editorial ethos, if you will. As a B2G company, we contract with government agencies, but we are not a government agency ourselves. That got us thinking — what is our ethos, exactly, and how can we let customers know what type of content to expect from us?

First off, as a B2G that provides content for municipalities, we never engage in political promotions of any kind, such as endorsing one party or candidate over another, or asking people to call their elected officials or sign a petition. Not only would that be unethical, it’s simply not our focus as a company.

Similarly, we don’t promote the sale of specific products or services. We provide educational — not promotional — content. We don’t run ads, advertorials or sponsored content. Whenever we advise certain actions, such as opting for reusable bags over plastic or paper bags, we direct readers to multiple paths they could take. There is no right way to get ahold of a reusable bag, and there is no small number of ways, either, so we simply provide a few of the obvious options.

Generally speaking, we believe that our society can evolve into a zero waste society, and we work — and write — in support of that goal. We promote recycling, but we also know that recycling should be a last resort. First and foremost, we should be reducing what we consume, and reusing every material we can. Additionally, we aspire to zero waste principles because they minimize the following: resource extraction; pollution caused by extraction, production, shipping, consumption and end-of-life disposal; littering; and leaching of chemicals and debris from landfills and recycling facilities into water supplies.

We view our audience — the communities that our customers serve — as split into three segments based on behavioral research data. Approximately ten percent of people are truly dedicated to preserving the environment, doing whatever they can to make a difference, all the time. We hope and expect that our content makes it that much easier for these people to keep doing what they’re doing. Then there’s another ten percent at the other end of the spectrum who are unlikely to take action to preserve the environment, regardless of what they hear or know. We honestly don’t see our content as a great solution for converting these people into committed recyclers or sustainable practitioners. This is a challenge that we are intrigued by and are actively thinking about solutions for, but one that we suspect has an entirely different solution than the one we are currently offering. Our main target audience is the vast middle 80 percent of the population in between these two groups. These are the people who are willing to act, but need better direction and a little motivation first. We target this group because the greatest return on investment in education and outreach will come from the largest numbers of people who can be swayed into positive action with the right information.

That is why, when we create content for our customers’ recycling guides, blog posts, social media posts or newsletters, we prioritize visually compelling content that is clearly written and easily actionable. We want any resident or business owner to be able to look for a topic, and see tips they can carry out easily, even if they just scan the page (which is what studies show the majority of people do). Easy, actionable tips are important for the persuadable 80 percent. These people aren’t determined to try to change the world today, but they are willing to do a little something from time to time, and that is how, over time, we can move towards a culture that values reducing waste and reusing valuable materials.

We steer clear of controversial issues such as waste-to-energy incineration or clean coal. Not only would addressing these issues be complicated, it’s not even relevant to our editorial mission, which is to inform and educate residents and businesses about everyday steps they can take in their own communities. Moreover, the controversial environmental issues tend to be political in nature, and as stated above, we do not engage in political topics of any kind.

As for the quality of our content, we carefully check our sources. We don’t publish information that says electronic cigarettes are better for the environment than traditional cigarettes when that information is being propagated by companies who sell e-cigarettes. We never fall for promoting greenwashed consumerism. We find unbiased scientific information from organizations and outlets such as the National Resources Defense Council, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Nature or Scientific American. We also put careful consideration into the information and actions we’re advocating. For example, if a product is being touted as eco-friendly just because it’s made from a certain material, we don’t take that statement at face value. For something to be termed eco-friendly also requires consideration of the likelihood of it being reused, composted or recycled successfully; how much energy it took to produce the product and how much energy it will take to recycle or dispose of it; and the environmental damage and pollution it creates throughout its lifecycle, from extraction to end-of-life.

Finally, for those of you who are interested in the nuts and bolts of our editorial process, we follow AP style and license royalty-free images. Every piece of content we publish receives at least one line edit and a copyedit after it’s been written. We run link checkers daily to ensure that our customers’ sites never have broken links. Because we publish digitally, we can always change something that is inaccurate or becomes outdated, and we are dedicated to staying on the cutting edge of our industry’s knowledge. We are committed to providing our clients with the highest quality product, which means we have to maintain up-to-date content at all times.

In thinking through these editorial standards and ethics, we thought that sharing them on our blog might be useful for others in similar positions of creating green content from a government perspective. We’ve been following an unwritten set of rules for some time, but now that we have actual guidelines written up, we are already appreciating that they are helpful doing exactly that — guiding our content creation process. We invite you to check out our demo site to see the guidelines in action. The recycling guide has zillions of examples of the clear, actionable tips referenced above. And the blog posts take a deeper dive while still focusing on simple steps that anyone can take towards moving us to a zero waste society.

Market-Tested Language to Inspire Environmental Action

It’s pretty hard to ignore the fact that the environment isn’t doing so well. From animal extinctions and dying rainforests to extreme, unpredictable weather, few bother to deny that something is amiss with Mother Nature. However, despite the fact that we know people should do things like drive less and consume less plastic, not many are motivated to pitch in and make a difference.

But actions do matter. So how do we inspire people to act? Change the way we talk about it. “Let’s Talk Climate: Messages to Motivate Americans” is a 2015 report by ecoAmerica, a think tank committed to improving communication around climate change in order to increase activism. They partnered with several other organizations, including the NRDC, to put together this PDF guide to market-tested language that will inspire action that’s better for the planet. Here are five key recommendations from what they found:

1. Don’t be gloomy. Jump quickly to solutions.

Knowing what’s wrong is fine, but it gets depressing — in order to avoid feeling helpless and overwhelmed, we need to know what we can do about it. Having a solution in sight, especially one that is clearly actionable, is motivating for citizens. Americans are also motivated by use of the word “we” (as opposed to “you” or “I”) because it generates a communal, can-do attitude. Think of statements such as “we can” or “we need,” and shift your message’s focus to possibilities for action and what can be achieved through that action. Similarly, avoid discussion of blame or villainous opponents. Instead, talk about the benefits that come from taking action on environmental issues, such as the freedom of choice that’s involved: “The choice is ours…for a clean energy future.”

2. Sell personal benefits, such as health, local issues and cost savings.

It’s easier for people to become actively invested in issues that will affect them personally than it is for them to become invested in large-scale or global issues. Even if citizens do care, such issues are more complicated and less tangible. So instead of talking about jobs lost, talk about savings gained, or costs that have been cut. Instead of talking about global repercussions of climate damage, talk about local repercussions. And remember to sell how it will affect citizens’ health — nothing is more personal than a person’s own body. Facts from non-partisan, third party sources, such as the American Lung Association, are most effective in this arena.

3. Family and children matter.

Make a connection between climate action and the moral responsibility we carry for future generations. Americans care about their families and providing a future for their children, and even those who are childless care about children and community.

4. Describe the “damage to the climate.”

Americans care about facts and actions they can take to prevent them from becoming reality. Also, the phrase “damage to the climate” receives better response rates than the phrases “climate change,” “climate crisis” and “global warming,” because it is less political and sounds like something you could prevent.

5. Use language to depict experiences your citizens can easily identify with.

For many, visual, descriptive language is easier to understand than abstract language or statistical data — people are good at seeing themselves in common scenarios and relating to them. For example, the highest rated message in ecoAmerica’s study begins: “Imagine driving a car that never requires paying at the pump. Imagine tastier fruits and vegetables from a local farmer you know. Imagine biking or walking on paths to shortcut through traffic and easy access to plentiful public transit. This is the clean energy future. And it’s within our grasp.”

 

For more language tips, view the full PDF report here.

It turns out that the way you say something does make a difference. So when you want people to take action, don’t just communicate more — follow these tips to communicate more effectively.